Lucas J. Tanglen

Successfully argued pro bono client's appeal before United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, resulting in ruling that client's criminal sentence violated the multiple punishments doctrine of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. constitution. Harmon v. Lamar, 640 Fed. Appx. 175 (3d Cir. 2016).

Counsel policyholders in broad range of industries -- including manufacturing, sports, entertainment, and healthcare -- regarding the review and placement of cyber insurance policies, including with respect to cutting-edge issues such as the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Counsel for policyholder in lawsuit seeking declaratory judgment of rights to insurance coverage for asbestos liabilities under historic general liability policies.

Counsel policyholders regarding insurance coverage for asbestos-related claims.

Counsel for policyholder in advertising injury insurance coverage action involving the use of a deceased athlete’s name to advertise and market running shoes and apparel. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided unanimously in favor of our client in this case of first impression, Holyoke Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vibram USA, Inc., 106 N.E.3d 572 (Mass. 2018).

Represented sports entertainment industry policyholder in obtaining coverage for traumatic brain injury (CTE) claims.

Represented policyholder in obtaining insurance recovery for securities and derivative lawsuits under directors and officers liability (D&O) insurance policies.