REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Employment Disputes
Defended a global financial institution in separate employment lawsuits filed in federal court
in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging whistleblower
retaliation and employment discriminations claims; and alleging disability discrimination,
harassment, and retaliation, obtaining a trial verdict dismissing all claims. Defeated a related
Sarbanes-Oxley complaint filed with the Department of Labor.
Represented a national software provider in a highly publicized, multi-jurisdictional dispute
with a direct competitor that hired several client employees. Pursued noncompete and trade
secret claims against the defendants on behalf of our client.
Represented a leading motor vehicle leasing company, and two management defendants, in a
25-plaintiff employment discrimination action in Washington state court. The plaintiffs were all
former employees at the company's Sea-Tac Airport operation who alleged discrimination based on
religion (Islam) and national origin (Somali). Plaintiffs were suspended and subsequently
terminated for refusing to clock out for paid prayer time at work. After a seven-week trial, the
jury returned a complete and unanimous defense verdict in favor of our clients. The Court of
Appeals of the State of Washington ruled in our client’s favor in a unanimous published opinion,
one of the first in Washington to clearly hold that a court need not instruct the jury on
pretext in a discrimination action. In addition to the state lawsuit, represented the company
before the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and
under the grievance process in its labor contract with the plaintiffs’ union.
Represented the news division of a global mass media company in defending a complex employment
tribunal claim that had been brought by a former producer for sex discrimination, harassment,
victimization, and equal pay.
Acted for a national sporting body and its state counterpart in defense of a claim of adverse
action on the basis of political opinion brought by a former employee who performed work as the
liaison with the Tasmanian Government. The client terminated her employment following the
discovery of several social media posts critical of her key stakeholders in the Tasmanian
Government. The former employee claimed that her employment was terminated because of her
political views. Due to her allegation that her dismissal was demanded by the Tasmanian premier,
this matter was the subject of national media attention and had the potential to seriously
damage the client's reputation and involve the Tasmanian Government in the Fair Work claim. The
matter was the subject of intense media scrutiny on a person's right to express personal
political opinions via social media. Had the matter proceeded it would have been the first case
to consider the provisions that contain an exception to political opinion discrimination in the
Fair Work Act. Assisted the client in the discipline process leading to the termination and
ensured the client properly articulated that it had dismissed the employee because her conduct
in publicly criticizing key stakeholders had demonstrated an inability to perform the inherent
requirements of her role.
Defended a global technology company against claims filed in the US District Court for the
Southern District of New York by a discharged former applications developer alleging wrongful
termination and retaliation based on disability and race in violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The alleged disability was hypertension,
diabetes, and adjustment disorder. The case ended in a dismissal with prejudice on summary
judgment.
Represented a multinational information technology and outsourcing company in a complaint
alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, national origin, race, and age, as well as
unlawful retaliation. Obtained dismissal.
Represented a food packaging manufacturer in a federal lawsuit relating to alleged violations of
the Family and Medical Leave Act, race- and sex-based discrimination and harassment, retaliation
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and wrongful discharge in violation of public policy
under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-422.1. Successfully resolved the matter for the client.
Represented a luxury hotel and casino as former employer and appellant in a case alleging
retaliation under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination. Obtained state Supreme Court
opinion of first impression favorably defining the elements of proof of retaliation.
Represented a global nuclear power company in an employment discrimination and retaliation case
filed in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina, alleging hundreds of
thousands of US dollars in damages. The matter was summarily dismissed with prejudice.
Represented a leading global personal care company on a high-profile whistleblower case in the
US District Court for the District of New Jersey brought by a former in-house patent attorney
who claimed that he had been terminated for expressing concerns about targets for patent
filings. Obtained summary judgment in favor of our client. The US Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit affirmed and denied the plaintiff’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.